![]() ![]() There seemed little opposition to the maintenance of seacoast harbors, but the expenditure of large sums of money for the development of a new inland country did not appeal so strongly to the representatives of seacoast States, where lay the balance of legislative power, and valiant service had to be rendered by the Western congressmen to secure even small appropriations for lake harbors. ![]() After much effort, a law was passed in 1826 making appropriations and providing for the examination, survey and improvement of the harbors on the northern lakes.īut for many years the improvements made were small and inadequate. On this account, wheat, flour and other produce did not pay for shipping to the Atlantic cities. The mouths of the rivers were usually so obstructed by sand that they prevented the entrance of vessels except in the early part of the season for a short period. Up to that time but little benefit was received from the natural advantages presented by the Great Lakes. But prior to 1824 the harbors on the lakes had received no attention direct from the government. Commerce has always been considered a subject of vital interest to the nation. Joseph Sellwood.ĪN appropriation for the support and maintenance of harbors was made in 1791 by the first Congress of the United States under the present constitution, and no subsequent Congress has failed to make similar appropriations. Maxim.Įvery increase in the depth of our Great Lakes channels enlarges the mineral output, cheapens transportation, lowers prices, and benefits the whole people. Emperor William II of Germany.Ī great ship must have deep water. Dangers To Navigation From Lack Of Harbors -Īnnual Appropriations From 1824 To 1845. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |